In a very unusual move, the Utah Federal District Court ordered the Social Security Administration to pay benefits to Jerry S. after fighting for disability benefits for more than 10 years. The court stated that “the tortured history of [Jerry’s] claim and the sheer number of errors over the years by the agency weigh in favor of an immediate award of benefits.”
Jerry was working as a diesel and heavy equipment mechanic in October of 2011 when his dominant left hand was caught in a radiator fan. He sustained severe injuries to his hand including a partial finger amputation. He was eventually diagnosed with Complex Regional Pain Syndrome, a nerve condition that caused chronic, severe pain in his left hand.
With the help of Barnes Disability Advocates, Jerry filed for Social Security disability insurance benefits in February of 2012. His claim was denied at the initial and reconsideration levels. A hearing was held in front of an administrative law judge in February of 2014. That judge denied benefits, but in doing so found that Jerry had significant limitations in using his dominant left hand.
In the ensuing years, Jerry’s claim would be denied by Social Security three more times, with two intervening appeals to the Utah Federal District Court. In both of those appeals the Social Security Administration agreed that it could not defend the denials and voluntarily set the Jerry’s claim back to correct errors.
The last time Social Security denied Jerry’s claim, the judge found that he had no limitations in using his badly damaged left hand despite every prior judge finding that he did have significant limitations. Jerry appealed again to the Utah Federal District Court for a third time. Natalie Bolli, a Barnes Disability attorney whose practice focuses on federal court cases argued the case.
The District Court judge found that the overwhelming evidence demonstrated that Jerry’s left hand injury resulted in manipulative limitations in both handling and fingering. The Court also found that evidence from multiple vocational experts showed that there were no jobs available to Jerry in the national economy because those manipulative limitations. The Court concluded that “there is simply no evidence that there are jobs that exist in significant numbers in the national economy that [Jerry] could perform given his combination of impairments.”
In ordering an award of benefits the Court noted that Social Security is not entitled to litigate a claim forever until it finally applies the proper legal standard and gets the necessary evidence to support its decision. The Court also noted that Jerry’s claim had been pending for over a decade and throughout that time, include four hearings by administrative law judges, Social Security had made many errors. The Court therefore ordered that Social Security award benefits to Jerry going all the way back to his injury in October 2011.
Most cases do not take as long as Jerry’s, which is one reason this win is so significant. It is also quite rare for the Utah Federal District Court to order the Social Security Administration to award benefits. Usually, the Court prefers to point out errors and give the agency the opportunity to correct them. Jerry has been forced to rely on family and friends during the extended period of this claim and those resources were essentially exhausted. He has not returned to work since the October 2011 accident that so severely injured his hand. This decision will ensure that he gets the benefits he needs to help get his life back in order.